Are we ready for the @CodeClub challenge (with infographic!)?

In recent weeks I’ve been assisting my kids’ primary school to get a Code Club together.  Code Club is a movement to establish coding / computing groups in at least 25% of primary schools across the country.  It’s volunteer-led, and only a few months old.  I’m very happy to support it.

In getting things set-up I spoke with teachers and governors, and even visited an existing Code Club in Stockport.  Many thanks to @lizhannaford for hosting us – Liz has posted a great blog around their first term activities.  Certainly , meeting others involved locally gave us more confidence to proceed.  For this reason, we’ll be hosting a Code Club organisers (and potential organisers) meetup at MadLab on 13th Jan – all welcome.

So – we will be starting our Code Club in January… hooray

 

The Greater Manchester Code Club Challenge

I was also very interested in what the 25% target set by Code Club meant to the 2.5 million people in Greater Manchester.  Hence, I grabbed the data on the number of schools from Edubase and did some simple calculations.  Taking that further I spend a bit (OK, too much!) time on Piktochart to get this infographic together.

Codeclub-challenge

Please share!

 

Missing Targets

At the back of my mind something does nag.  This week we saw several sporting bodies stripped of their funding for missing grassroots targets.  With computing/maker skills, we don’t yet have the equivialent of a national body charged with this.  I’m in two minds as to whether this should exclusively be associated with schools (especially in terms of the progress we’re making at MadLab).  Nevertheless, the target set by CodeClub presents challenges – we are only 10% there (ie 2.5%!) locally – what happens if we miss it?  In the long term view – how do we measure the impact we are having?

 

Less Yak, More Hack

In the meantime, these musings shouldn’t get in the way of us rising to, and shaping, the challenge.  John at Mozilla mentioned this “mantra”, which does chime well.  If we are serious about the digital skills our children need to suceeed, then this target is quite modest, surely?  Indeed, this not only contains a target (25%) but a deadline (end of 2014).  

Who’s in?  How can you help?  It’s time for us to act…

Hands up if you can help make it happen….  

 

 

 

 

 

Five local uses of social media in the community…

At the recent #coops2012 and #mediacitysms social media surgeries, Kate and I shared a few examples of local organisations using social media to engage the local community.  I thought it best to post these up and share.  By no means are these “the best of the social web”, or a definitive list – just ones we thought were useful.  And yes, Salford Lads Club gets two mentions !

I’ve highlighted below the organisation, the social media channel and a very brief overview. 

Manchester Archives using Flickr

Mcrarchives

Manchester Archives share lots of their content on photo-sharing website Flickr.  It leads to significant engagement, comments and detail from people – arguably more than if the archives would remain under lock and key….

Salford Lads Club using Facebook

Slc-fb

Salford Lads Club are utilising the Facebook timeline to post “milestones” from their long history.  There are now posts going back to 1904 – highlight both the club’s history but also a quick and easy way to utilise a standard Facebook feature.

Working Class Movement Library using Twitter

Download

The WCML marked the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Bexley Square by live tweeting the events of the historic day.  This highlights an important event, but also utilised the real-time nature of Twitter.

Salford Lads Club using Storify (and Twitter)

Slc

Salford Lads Club encourage Smiths’ fans to tweet their pictures, which are added to an ongoing storify story.  This adds an interesting layer to “user-generated content” (can I still say that?!) – important tip: thank people personally via Twitter (not the auto-function of Storify).

Greater Manchester Police (Chorlton) using Twitter

Gmpchorlton

@GMPChorlton tweet about local incidents, respond directly to questions and comments, and declare who is tweeting / on-shift.  It’s a simple conversation channel, but effective and in a relevant two-way tone.

 

What do these have in common?

Two things:

- Using a relevant channel.  In these instances, the use of the tool fits the intended purpose.  Photo sharing = Flickr.  Realtime = Twitter. Of course, these could have been done in other ways, but these approaches fix on one, rather than scatter across many.

- Simplicity.  There are no big teams or huge budgets (or any budget!) to these actions.  People planned, discussed and got on…. 

 

Know of others?  Pop along to your nearest and next social media surgery and share….

Declining Facebook page reach

Yesterday we posted a photo of the new Morrissey mosiac that has been donated to Salford Lads Club.  As expected, it received a lot attention in the form of 67 Likes, six comments and one share (yes, that was me!).

Mosiac

Despite this being our biggest hit (in terms of Likes) Facebook tell us that these stats are not our most popular:

483 people saw this post. Organic = 133.  Viral = 352. 

It is this one:

Postman

This has:

534 people saw this post.  Organic = 185.  Viral = 359

But – this was acheived with just 20 Likes, six comments and no shares…

 

So how did a post with over three times as many Likes get less views?

In short, it’s because Facebook really want you to pay to reach people!

There’s been lots of dicussion on mailing lists around this, covering a tweak in the FB algorithm, through to fake accounts being purged centrally.  But, to the end user / page admin it makes the whole experience less rewarding and more frustrating if the basic stats don’t add up.  As one observer notes, it’s Broken on Purpose.

Hulme-based semantics

Whilst going to Manchester town hall this morning, I saw this on the temporary fence around current building site:

Imag0881

It reads:

Hulme-based Laing O’Rourke is an international construction company with a long history of working in partnership with Manchester City Council.

And, sure enough on my way home to Hulme I walked past Laing O’Rourke:

Imag0882

Case closed.

But, the term “Hulme-based” was nagging me.  

A quick glance at the Laing O’Rourke website told me their headquarters are actually in Darford, Kent.  And that’s the European division.

Historically, Wikipedia told me that the O’Rourke side was founded in East London, whilst the origins of Laing lie in Cumbria.

Legally, Open Corporates told me there were at least 19 companies registered to Laing O’Rourke, all in Kent.

In terms Corporate Social Responsibility, I could only see mention of the good deeds Laing O’Rourke do in the Middle East and Australia.

The longer I looked, the less meaning “Hulme-based” had.

The reality is probably that an empty office building at the end of a motorway made a good choice for an international construction company busy with contractors and projects. Hulme is just a business rates detail. Whilst I welcome companies opening office and bringing in employees, I’m not so sure about the place-making sentiment lauded upon it.

For me, purposefully using the term “Hulme-based” means implying an organisation is a part and parcel of the local fabric.  The team designing the slogans and images for the fence around the building site made a choice to use “Hulme-based” – why?  

What next? Walmart is “Hulme-based” as we have an ASDA?

My FKW moment

The NetSquared Global Leadership Council call was scheduled at 5pm.  

I play football at 6pm.  

To be the most effective with my time I decided to wear my usual five-a-side attire – a full Manchester City kit.  To be clear, I *only* wear this kit for *playing* football, not watching or going to it, or anything else!  

But, the call was on Google+.  And livestreamed.  Hence, my immediate thought on seeing my screen for the call (pic below) was the #FullKitWanker meme that has sprung up recently, since an inspired (and quite harsh!) post by Richard Price.

Fkw

We lost 7-1 too.  Dreadful

Flogging dead social media funnies…

Interesting tangent: the efforts people go to to extend someone else’s joke in the vague hope of catching attention.  That ship has sailed – leave it!

The original post by Richard Price on the 24th August was fairly acknowledged to have derived from message boards and twitter in-jokes.  As the post attracted more shares, comments, tweets and likes, some seem to have thought it worthy to try and capitalise.  Hence, the domain name fullkitwankers.com was bought on the 28th August, along with an empty blog and soon-to-expire twitter account.  This doesn’t seem connected to the originators.  

With the football season starting, you can sense how this may be perceived to be a sure-fire hit.  But, my feeling is that it won’t thrive – its very nature means it can easily slip into outright abuse and misunderstanding – a fine line the original meme *just about* got the right side, and walked away….

 

Shocker. Images work better in Facebook posts.

Just recently, I’ve encouraged Salford Lads Club to take and upload some images for their Facebook page.  There was a Morrissey concert in Manchester, some new t-shirts and even some special biscuits!

Surprise, surprise, images work in Facebook!

Slc-fb-graph

Although, it’s not really a surprise.  For a good while we’d been using an RSS feed to post through news stories, but sans images.   As we can see from this table – the last news item to do that didnt have any social value:

Slc-fb-table

So, it seems a good tactic – especially if we can get more poses and pictures like this:

Leslie2

Update: will review in line with something like this: How NGOs Win with Facebook: Better Engagement in Five Easy Lessons

Building the #npdata Tiny Data Habits

 

Data Discussions @ The Guardian

Yesterday I attended an event at the Guardian offices in London, hosted by TechSoup Global, and focused on the field of non-profits using data.  

Presentations and discussions were engaging, and far reaching.  As is the norm with this type of event we seemed to jump around data collection, publication, visualisation and interchange concepts around Open, Big and Private data.  Throw into the mix some expression around privacy, outcomes, impact and sustainability and you can imagine the head scratching.

Nevertheless, it’s great to continue these discussions, and the twitter stream was also active.

More to follow, no doubt.

3 Tiny Habits

7185961249_2818a5c8a8_n

Serendipitously, on the train back to Mcr, I delved into something I had hanging around to read: the “3 Tiny Habits” methodology from BJ Fogg.  Fogg is really interested in how we form and keep new habits. His approach is for people to aim to establish three habits over a week, so long as each has the the following characteristics:

  • you do [the habit] at least once a day
  • [the habit] takes you less then 30 seconds
  • [the habit] requires little effort

Interestingly, Fogg also recommends that new habits are best learnt when undertaken after existing one:

After I [existing habit/anchor], I will [new tiny behaviour]

For example, he cites:

After I turn on lights in evening, I will close the sunroom blinds.

It’s interesting stuff, which I’ll try.

 

Data Processes are Personal

Back to the non-profit data.  It struck me that the conversations were mainly centred upon the organisation and its relationship to data.  

  • A community group could publish data.  
  • A charity should use data.  
  • An NGO might mine data.  

I’m thinking we need to shift this down to the specific people and tasks/tools within these entities if we are to get significant traction:

  • The chair of a community group would be responsible for publishing their funding data
  • A researcher at a charity would monitor CKAN packages for data sources particular to their field of interest
  • An activist at an NGO would use a tool such as Google Refine to cleanup messy data received from the field

.. rinse and repeat.

 

Tiny Data Habits

And so, putting 2+2 together – you might see where the Tiny Data Habits is headed!  

If we can:

  • break down our data functions and processes
  • build habits and routines at the personal level
  • turn these into routine and regular behaviours

…then maybe there is a foundation for a better #npdata ecosystem:

Of course, there may be some straying from the rules of habit-forming described by BJ Fogg, but I’m interested in how establishing clear data related habits for people within non-profits can be established, maintained and developed:

  • After the AOB agenda of a committee meeting, the chair of a community group will enquire with others what funding data is available to publish
  • After lunch each day, a researcher at a charity will check their CKAN feeds subscription for new datasets
  • After downloading a new data file, an NGO activist would run pre-compiled scripts via Google Refine (or similar).

 

Erm, anyone any other ideas on what these Tiny Data Habits would be?

 

(And the photo?  I’m trying to form a habit to photograph our sunflowers each day for the MOSI Alan Turning project

 

 

 

Anyone interested in a #nptech #FormatCamp?

Years ago, my not-for-profit tech community activities mainly consisted of teaching youth workers HTML (HTML4!).

By contrast, I’ve been involved in the following over the past year:

Alongside these, I’ve *nearly* managed to get along to the following – which all share a concern around nptech:

And then, more widely:

No doubt, I’ve probably missed a few…

100_0138

What Works?

Of course, this ecosystem of events, meetups, festivals, conferences and interactions take place because people organise them, and others show up.  There isn’t a need to go in search of a winning formula or try to rationalise/aggregate.  What I am interested in, is how people with these conversations and perspectives could be brought together for a short time – around the focus of nptech.  

How do we best support and stimulate such a wide array of initiatives?  How do we avoid unnecessary duplication?  How do we best describe this to a grassroots organisation?

Different Events, Different Lenses

I’m thinking there are (at least) three different ways to think about these various formats:

Help <> Support

To what degree to the event format provide direct help to non-profits?  

To what degree is the event aimed at supporting those already working in nfptech?

Regular <> One-off

Is the event something that takes places weekly/monthly/quarterly, or more of a one-off action (I’m unsure where an annual event sits!)?

Independent <> Franchised

Particularly at the local level – is the event part of a wider identifiable network of similar events?  Or, is it independent in name and nature?

FormatCamp?

With this in mind, I propose a #FormatCamp for people interested in these issues to come together and swap stories and perspectives.  It’d be useful to consider such things as Accessibility, Impact and Resources.  It would also be useful to just get likeminds together and have a cup of tea!

Interested? What Next?

If you’re interested in the idea of shaping FormatCamp, then I’ve opened a public Google Doc for people to collaborate.  Tentatively, I’m thinking:

  • September/October
  • Overnigtht, at a youth hostel (ie: somewhere interesting and cheap!)
  • Somewhere central (but *not* London…)

Please add your thoughts to the GDoc, and we can then arrange next steps…

 

Customer service via the @PostOffice

I had a Watchdog moment the other day.  

My local post office sold me a more expensive postal package without providing me any options.  When I queried it, they claimed it was “too late”.  

An outrage!  

I took to twitter, and got a response:

Postoffice

With this prompt, I emailed a complaint.  A week later, I got an apology letter and a book of first class stamps! More tweets:

Postoffice2

If only Victor Meldrew had had social media.